The private equity industry faces a peculiar temporal trap. According to HarbourVest Partners, implementing a comprehensive AI-enablement playbook across a portfolio company typically requires one to two years before material EBITDA impact materializes[1]. Yet public market analysts expect quarterly articulation of AI strategy. This fundamental mismatch between execution velocity and investor expectations has created what might be called the AI value creation paradox: the technology promising the highest returns demands the longest patience from capital providers increasingly starved for distributions.
đź’Ľ M&A / PE diligence in 24 hours? Yes, thanks to AI!
The urgency surrounding this dynamic has intensified dramatically. In PwC’s latest survey of private equity leadership, 50% of PE respondents believe generative AI and agentic AI will have the most transformative impact on their industry over the next three years, with 54% citing these technologies as the highest investment priority in the next year[16]. This represents far more than technology enthusiasm; it reflects existential concern. Firms without credible AI strategies face competitive erosion, particularly as dry powder sits at historic highs and the pressure to deploy accelerates. Yet the path from conviction to execution remains fraught with operational complexity.
Consider the mathematical reality of AI implementation at mid-market portfolio companies. Accenture’s analysis of nearly 40 portfolio companies reveals that while AI experimentation is broad, real value capture clusters around specific sectors and capabilities[13]. Moreover, a striking finding emerges: nearly 90% of portfolio company AI use cases never move beyond the pilot stage[27]. This is not a technology problem; it is a discipline problem. Many pilots fail because companies overreach before establishing foundational governance structures and data strategies. Portfolio companies with sound governance and clear data architecture in place, by contrast, are significantly better positioned to scale high-impact use cases and track return on investment.
The magnitude of potential returns, however, justifies the discipline required. Organizations implementing comprehensive AI strategies are achieving 160 to 280 basis points of EBITDA improvement within 24 months[60]. At portfolio company valuations typical in the middle market, such improvements can translate to enterprise value increases of 15% to 25% at exit. In Accenture’s experience, every dollar invested in AI transformation can deliver 2 to 4 times annualized EBITDA uplift, a multiplier effect that materially compounds valuation expansion[27]. These are returns that dwarf traditional operational optimization playbooks.
The strategic challenge lies not in the magnitude of the opportunity but in the sequencing and measurement rigor required to capture it. Firms must move beyond experimentation narratives to establish explicit linkage between pilots and P&L outcomes. This requires PE sponsors to enforce a discipline that many portfolio company management teams have not previously encountered: treating AI investment like any other capital deployment, with defined baselines, control groups, and measurable ROI within predetermined timeframes. The winners in this space will be GPs that have built internal data science capabilities to guide this work and can articulate credible implementation playbooks to both their management teams and their limited partners.
From Financial Engineering to Operational Transformation: The Shifting PE Value Creation Paradigm
The transition from financial engineering to operational value creation has moved from rhetorical aspiration to strategic necessity. In recent Bain analysis, two out of three GPs now expect operational value creation to become more important than financial engineering over the next five years[47]. This shift has profound implications not only for portfolio company strategy but for deal structure itself.
Higher interest rates and tighter lending standards have made the traditional leverage arbitrage increasingly marginal as a value creation lever. A typical buyout financed in the current environment carries a cost of debt significantly higher than the pre-2022 baseline, compressing the spread between cost of capital and operating returns. In such an environment, the traditional playbook—borrow cheap, exit at higher multiples—depends critically on operational execution. If a portfolio company’s EBITDA doesn’t grow, there is no multiple expansion to compensate for higher financing costs.
This shift has direct implications for how PE firms think about value creation timelines and exit strategy. Where sponsors once viewed a five-to-seven-year hold period as sufficient for financial engineering to deliver returns, they now increasingly recognize that sustainable value creation requires longer tenures and deeper operational commitment. The exit backlog in the market confirms this dynamic: PE-backed companies remain in portfolios significantly longer than historical averages, reflecting both the scarcity of attractive exit opportunities and the recognition that more time is needed to execute transformational operational initiatives[31].
The emphasis on operational transformation has particular implications for AI deployment. AI is not a financial engineering tool; it is an operational lever. It drives efficiency in core business processes, enables top-line growth through better customer analytics and pricing optimization, and fundamentally changes how portfolio companies compete. For PE firms operating in higher-cost-of-capital environments, AI enablement becomes not a nice-to-have enhancement but a critical path item in the value creation playbook. Without credible operational improvement stories anchored in AI-driven productivity gains, the narrative justifying extended hold periods becomes untenable.
The Dayforce Precedent: AI as Strategic Rationale in Take-Private Transactions
The strategic importance of AI in PE deal rationale crystallized in Thoma Bravo’s landmark $12.3 billion take-private transaction of Dayforce in August 2025[25]. This deal represents more than a single acquisition; it signals a strategic inflection in how leading PE buyers justify control premiums and structure long-term value creation narratives.
Dayforce, a global leader in human capital management (HCM) technology, had been a publicly traded company trading at multiples that reflected the expectations of public market investors. Yet Thoma Bravo identified specific value creation opportunities that, in the sponsor’s view, could only be realized through the accelerated decision-making environment and longer time horizons of private ownership. Central to the deal rationale, as articulated by Thoma Bravo’s managing partners, was the opportunity to accelerate Dayforce’s AI capabilities[25].
Consider the strategic logic. HCM software is increasingly commoditized at the functional level—every competitor can deliver payroll, benefits administration, and talent management. The companies that command premium valuations and customer switching costs are those that embed AI deeply into their platforms: AI-driven workforce analytics that predict attrition, generative AI assistants that automate HR processes, machine learning models that optimize compensation and workforce planning. A company in public markets faces quarterly earnings pressure that makes multi-year R&D investments in AI capabilities difficult to justify. Wall Street analysts want to see immediate incremental revenue contribution from such investments; they penalize public company management teams for recognizing that the highest-ROI investments often have deferred payoff profiles.
In private ownership, by contrast, Dayforce gains the strategic flexibility to invest aggressively in AI capabilities without justifying every quarterly dollar of incremental spend to public market skeptics. The transaction also included a significant minority investment from Abu Dhabi Investment Authority (ADIA), providing additional permanent capital to support long-term capability building[25]. This structure—combining PE operational expertise with institutional capital backing—has become increasingly common in deals with substantial technology or infrastructure components.
The Dayforce precedent carries several implications for deal sourcing and strategy going forward. First, it establishes AI acceleration as a credible stand-alone rationale for control premiums in take-private transactions, particularly in software and business services categories. This allows PE sponsors to target companies where public market trading multiples may not fully value the long-term strategic importance of AI investments. Second, it signals that the most attractive take-private candidates in 2025-2026 are not distressed businesses requiring turnarounds but rather well-functioning companies whose strategic acceleration PE ownership can catalyze. This represents a meaningful shift from the distressed/value investment posture that dominated the low-valuation environment of 2022-2023.
The Evolution of Deal Structures: From Drawdowns to Permanence and Creative Engineering
The private equity industry’s approach to deal structure itself is undergoing rapid evolution, driven by two powerful forces: accelerating investor demand for liquidity and the maturation of alternative capital sources. These forces are reshaping not only how individual deals are financed but how entire portfolios are constructed and managed over time.
The Rise of Continuation Vehicles and GP-Led Transactions
Perhaps no structural innovation better captures the current market moment than the explosive growth of continuation funds and GP-led secondary transactions. In 2024, GP-led transactions reached $72 billion in volume, with single-asset continuation funds representing approximately 48% of the total, surging in popularity as sponsors gravitated towards “trophy” assets[36]. This represents a fundamental shift in how private equity manages portfolio maturation.
Historically, when a private equity portfolio company matured and management prepared for exit, the sponsor faced limited options: sell to a strategic buyer in an M&A transaction, pursue an IPO, or distribute the investment back to limited partners at current valuation. In many cases, the timing of exit was dictated not by optimal value realization but by fund life cycle constraints. A company in a 10-year fund typically exited in years 4-5, leaving significant unrealized value on the table. Limited partners received distributions at that point, even if they would have preferred to remain invested in a high-performing asset.
Continuation vehicles—structures wherein a GP creates a new fund specifically to acquire high-performing assets from the original fund at fair-market valuation—invert this dynamic. Now, sponsors can retain ownership of trophy assets while simultaneously providing liquidity to existing limited partners. Those LPs can choose to reinvest in the continuation vehicle on new terms or realize their gains. The sponsor maintains ownership stakes in the continuation fund (typically ranging from 5% to 25%, versus the 2% to 5% commitment required in traditional funds), creating significant alignment incentives[21].
The economics of continuation vehicles have proven compelling. Unlike traditional leveraged buyouts where sponsors rely on multiple arbitrage and leverage gain for returns, continuation funds depend almost entirely on organic value creation and the ability of the sponsor to extend the runway for strategic initiatives. This incentive alignment is profound: GPs now have direct financial exposure to whether their operational value creation playbooks—including AI enablement strategies—actually deliver incremental returns.
The market structure surrounding continuation vehicles has also matured. Where sponsors once struggled to raise investor appetite for secondary transactions, a robust ecosystem of secondaries-focused funds now actively bids for continuation vehicle allocations. In 2024, secondary market volume reached unprecedented levels, up approximately 39% compared to 2023, with continuation funds now comprising approximately 79% of GP-led transaction volume[36]. This depth of buyer demand has narrowed bid-ask spreads, improving pricing for sponsors and enhancing the returns available to LPs who choose to stay invested.
Creative Deal Structures and Hybrid Financing Models
Beyond continuation vehicles, PE sponsors are deploying an increasingly sophisticated toolkit of creative deal structures to navigate the current market environment. These structures address specific challenges that traditional leveraged buyouts handle poorly: valuation gaps between buyers and sellers, risk mitigation requirements, and the ability to accommodate multiple investor constituencies with divergent risk/return preferences.
Earnouts and contingent consideration represent perhaps the most familiar creative structure; they remain popular particularly in situations where buyer and seller have divergent views about future performance[9]. By tying a portion of purchase price to future results, earnouts align incentives and allow sponsors to bridge valuation disagreements. In the current environment, where macro uncertainty around tariffs and geopolitical risks has increased forecasting difficulty, contingent structures have become increasingly common.
Minority investments with control rights have gained traction as PE sponsors seek to access high-growth companies without requiring majority ownership. These structures allow sponsors to maintain upside participation while reducing capital requirements and enabling current shareholders to retain meaningful equity stakes, often with ongoing management engagement[9]. Such structures are particularly valuable in founder-led technology companies where founder retention is critical to value realization.
Structured equity—combining elements of debt and equity to provide flexible financing solutions—has also proliferated. These instruments can include preferred equity with cumulative dividends, liquidation preferences, and conversion rights, offering PE sponsors downside protection while maintaining upside exposure. In the current higher-rate environment, structured equity often proves more efficient than traditional leveraged financing from a cost-of-capital perspective.
Joint ventures and strategic partnerships have emerged as critical deal structures, particularly in infrastructure and AI-adjacent businesses. The Meta-Blue Owl Capital joint venture to develop Meta’s Hyperion data center project exemplifies this trend[38]. By combining operational expertise with permanent capital, joint venture structures enable sponsors to pursue opportunities that might exceed any single firm’s risk tolerance or capital constraints. These partnerships also facilitate the blending of different capital sources—institutional LPs, alternative managers, and corporate strategic investors—within a single vehicle.
Revenue-based financing, ESG-linked financing, and other innovative structures increasingly appear in the PE toolkit. Revenue-based financing, which ties repayment obligations to portfolio company revenue performance, is particularly attractive for high-growth companies where traditional debt covenants might be overly restrictive. ESG-linked financing, where interest rates adjust based on achievement of specific sustainability metrics, reflects both regulatory expectations and LP preferences regarding portfolio company governance[9].
The Evergreen Fund Alternative
An alternative to traditional drawdown fund structures is gaining institutional acceptance: evergreen funds that maintain permanent capital and deploy continuously without predetermined fund life limits. Total evergreen assets have now surpassed $427 billion, with adoption accelerating particularly in private credit and real estate[32].
Evergreen structures offer specific advantages in the current market environment. Rather than being constrained by fund life cycles, portfolio companies can remain invested as long as value creation opportunities persist. Unlike continuation vehicles (which address a single portfolio company maturation), evergreen structures operate at portfolio level, providing investors with continuous exposure to a diversified set of private market assets. Investors fund their entire commitment upfront in cash rather than through periodic drawdowns, gaining immediate portfolio allocation without waiting for capital calls[2].
However, evergreen structures carry distinct risks. Performance dispersion within the evergreen universe is significant. Over the 12 months ending April 2025, median returns ranged from 13.8% in private equity to just 3.0% in real estate, as per PitchBook data[32].
Sources
https://www.pehub.com/ai-playbook-a-major-value-creation-lever-says-harbourvest-deal-structures-face-innovation-pressure/, https://www.harbourvest.com/insights-news/insights/how-to-use-evergreen-drawdowns-private-equity/, https://www.harbourvest.com/pi-webinar-private-equity-aligning-the-playbook/, https://www.harbourvest.com/insights-news/insights/market-outlook-forging-ahead-private-markets-power-up-for-a-busy-2026/, https://www.harbourvest.com, https://cjgustafson.substack.com/p/from-take-privates-to-ai-mapping, https://www.harbourvest.com/insights-news/insights/beyond-the-past-and-before-the-future-interpreting-the-present-state-of-artificial-intelligence-in-private-markets/, https://cjgustafson.substack.com/p/from-take-privates-to-ai-mapping, https://www.claconnect.com/en/resources/blogs/private-equity/creative-deal-structures-for-private-equity-firms-other-investors, https://www.pehub.com/ai-playbook-a-major-value-creation-lever-says-harbourvest-deal-structures-face-innovation-pressure/, https://www.harbourvest.com/insights-news/insights/mc-2025-private-market-predictions/, https://ma-litigation.sidley.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/03/Sidley_Creative-Deal-Structures_2020_WR.pdf, https://www.accenture.com/us-en/blogs/private-equity/unlock-mid-market-value-through-ai, https://privatecapitalglobal.com/blog/ai-in-private-equity-unlocking-value-in-portfolio-optimization, https://cjgustafson.substack.com/p/from-take-privates-to-ai-mapping, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/library/private-equity-ai-transformation.html, https://www.orrick.com/en/Insights/2025/10/Tech-Transformation-Addressing-AI-Risk-Across-Funds-and-Portfolios, https://www.pehub.com/ai-playbook-a-major-value-creation-lever-says-harbourvest-deal-structures-face-innovation-pressure/, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/private-capital/our-insights/global-private-markets-report, https://www.tradersmagazine.com/am/market-structure-evolution-policy-shifts-and-trading-dynamics/, https://www.chronograph.pe/the-rise-of-continuation-funds-a-deep-dive/, https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/private-equity/pulse, https://www.buyoutsinsider.com/petershill-on-an-evolving-liquidity-landscape/, https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/viewpoints/102l4jb/continuation-funds-a-structural-phenomenon, https://www.thomabravo.com/press-releases/dayforce-enters-into-us12.3-billion-definitive-agreement-with-thoma-bravo-to-become-a-private-company, https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/private-capital/our-insights/global-private-markets-report, https://www.accenture.com/us-en/blogs/private-equity/unlock-mid-market-value-through-ai, https://investors.dayforce.com/news-and-events/press-releases/press-release-details/2025/Dayforce-Stockholders-Approve-Acquisition-by-Thoma-Bravo/default.aspx, https://www.alliancebernstein.com/us/en-us/investments/insights/investment-insights/how-private-and-public-markets-are-combining-to-fund-the-ai-buildout.html, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/library/private-equity-ai-transformation.html, https://www.bain.com/insights/private-equity-midyear-report-2025/, https://www.sganalytics.com/blog/evergreen-funds-growth-gaps-and-caution/, https://www.blackrock.com/institutions/en-us/insights/thought-leadership/private-markets-secondaries, https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2025/09/2-us-pe-market-recap, https://www.dakota.com/resources/blog/top-10-evergreen-funds-launched-in-q3-2025, https://lazard.com/media/drch42gk/lazard-2024-secondary-market-report.pdf, https://www.ropesgray.com/en/insights/alerts/2025/11/artificial-intelligence-q3-2025-global-report, https://about.fb.com/news/2025/10/meta-blue-owl-capital-develop-hyperion-data-center/, https://www.ey.com/en_ch/insights/strategy-transactions/ai-in-private-equity, https://www.kkr.com/insights/ai-infrastructure, https://investor.atmeta.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2025/Meta-Announces-Joint-Venture-with-Funds-Managed-by-Blue-Owl-Capital-to-Develop-Hyperion-Data-Center/default.aspx, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/library/private-equity-ai-transformation.html, https://stockstory.org/us/stocks/nyse/ai/news/earnings-call/ai-q3-deep-dive-bookings-rebound-federal-wins-offset-ongoing-revenue-decline, https://www.ey.com/en_us/insights/private-equity/pulse, https://imaa-institute.org/blog/the-future-role-of-artificial-intelligence-in-mergers-and-acquisitions/, https://www.investing.com/news/transcripts/earnings-call-transcript-c3ai-q2-2026-beats-eps-expectations-stock-rises-93CH-4389720, https://www.bain.com/insights/private-equity-midyear-report-2025/, https://ncmahq.org/Web/Shared_Content/CM-Magazine/CM-Magazine-February-2024/Preparing-for-AI-in-Acquisition.aspx, https://www.ey.com/en_ch/insights/strategy-transactions/ai-in-private-equity, https://www.harbourvest.com/insights-news/insights/mc-2025-private-market-predictions/, https://www.schroders.com/en-us/us/intermediary/insights/private-markets-investment-outlook-q4-2025-focus-on-resilience/, https://www.pwc.com/us/en/industries/financial-services/library/private-equity-ai-transformation.html, https://www.harbourvest.com/insights-news/insights/beyond-the-past-and-before-the-future-interpreting-the-present-state-of-artificial-intelligence-in-private-markets/, https://www.adamsstreetpartners.com/insights/private-markets-2026-outlook-improving-liquidity-amid-greater-ai-adoption/, https://digitaldefynd.com/IQ/private-equity-case-studies/, https://www.alixpartners.com/insights/102l4bn/unlocking-value-creation-in-healthcare-how-ai-can-reverse-private-equitys-retur/, https://www.aicerts.ai/news/enterprise-adoption-slows-as-firms-dodge-rigorous-ai-roi-metrics/, https://www.brownloop.com/case-study/transforming-operations-at-a-global-private-equity-firm-with-ai-and-automation/, https://www.privateequityinternational.com/permira-on-ai-enabled-value-creation-beyond-the-tech-sector/, https://www.betsol.com/blog/ai-enabled-it-services-increasing-ebitda-margins-through-operational-excellence/
