The Police & Fire Retirement System of Detroit has filed a derivative lawsuit against Hess Corporation, alleging governance failures in the $53 billion Chevron acquisition. The suit claims Hess directors breached fiduciary duties by failing to conduct market checks, omitting material transaction details, and approving excessive change-in-control benefits for CEO John Hess exceeding $101 million. This legal action emerges as an international arbitration panel prepares to rule on ExxonMobil’s claim to preemptive rights over Hess’s 30% Guyana stake—a decision that could nullify the deal entirely. The lawsuit further highlights razor-thin shareholder approval (51%) and Federal Trade Commission restrictions barring John Hess from Chevron’s board due to alleged OPEC communications, compounding governance concerns in one of 2025’s most contentious energy mergers.
💼 M&A / PE diligence in 24 hours? Yes, thanks to AI!
Legal Architecture of the Acquisition Challenge
Derivative Suit Core Allegations
The Detroit pension fund’s complaint, filed in Delaware Chancery Court, centers on Hess’s alleged failure to conduct a meaningful market check before accepting Chevron’s all-stock offer. According to the suit, Hess’s 30% stake in Guyana’s Stabroek Block—representing approximately 80% of the deal’s value—attracted “enthusiastic market interest” that should have triggered competitive bidding[1][45]. Instead, directors reportedly bypassed standard sale protocols, violating fiduciary duties under Delaware corporate law. The complaint specifically references Hess’s proxy statement omissions regarding alternative strategic options and engagement with potential counterparties, creating what plaintiffs characterize as an informational vacuum preventing shareholders from properly evaluating the transaction[1][14].
Parallel Arbitration Battle
Simultaneously, ExxonMobil and CNOOC’s arbitration claim before the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) threatens the deal’s foundation. The co-venturers assert a contractual right of first refusal over Hess’s Guyana assets under the Stabroek Block joint operating agreement[18][55]. Chevron and Hess counter that this provision applies only to asset sales, not corporate mergers[56][59]. Arbitrators reached a decision in early July 2025, but the ICC continues reviewing the ruling before release to parties[55][57]. Industry analysts note the unprecedented nature of this dispute: Should Exxon prevail, Chevron may either renegotiate terms, compensate Exxon for the stake, or abandon the acquisition entirely per the merger agreement’s $1.7 billion breakup clause[5][18].
Regulatory Hurdles
The Federal Trade Commission’s September 2024 merger approval contained a critical governance condition: John Hess was barred from joining Chevron’s board due to alleged “public and private communications” with OPEC representatives about production constraints[7][37]. This rare personal sanction—unrelated to traditional antitrust concerns—reflects regulatory scrutiny of executive influence on commodity markets. FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson dissented, calling the condition “extortionist” and noting Chevron’s concession was a pragmatic choice to avoid litigation delays despite legally questionable grounds[37]. The ruling exemplifies increasing regulatory willingness to impose behavioral remedies beyond conventional market concentration concerns.
Governance Deficiencies Under Microscope
Executive Compensation Controversy
John Hess’s $101 million change-in-control package—including $18 million cash severance and accelerated equity vesting—features prominently in the lawsuit as evidence of misaligned incentives[6][25]. This compensation structure exceeds industry benchmarks: Alvarez & Marsal’s 2020 Executive Change in Control Report shows average CEO benefits at $27.9 million, making Hess’s package 262% above norm[26][30]. The Detroit fund argues this “golden parachute” influenced deal support despite shareholder rejection of related advisory votes[1][3]. Documentation reveals the compensation committee approved these terms while J.P. Morgan served dual roles as Hess’s M&A advisor and Hess Midstream’s credit agent—a conflict generating $7.6 million in fees[2][38].
Shareholder Dissent Patterns
With only 51% of voting shares approving the transaction, the narrow margin signals profound investor skepticism[1][31]. Proxy advisor Institutional Shareholder Services recommended abstention, citing arbitration uncertainty, while Glass Lewis supported the deal based on premium valuation[31]. Hedge funds controlling 6% of shares (HBK Capital, D.E. Shaw, Pentwater Capital) withheld support, and Vanguard’s 10% stake remained undisclosed at vote time[31]. This dissent contrasts sharply with Exxon’s 2019 acquisition of Pioneer Natural Resources, which secured 95% approval. The lawsuit attributes weak endorsement to inadequate disclosure of arbitration risks and regulatory obstacles—omissions allegedly preventing fully informed voting[14][39].
Board Oversight Questions
The complaint challenges director independence given historical governance issues. Hess’s 2013 proxy battle with Elliott Management revealed previous board members’ close ties to the Hess family, including former New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean and ex-Senator Sam Nunn, who lacked oil industry experience[10]. Though Hess added three Elliott-nominated directors post-settlement, the current board approved the Chevron deal despite: (1) the CEO’s controversial OPEC communications triggering FTC restrictions; (2) ongoing environmental liabilities including Gowanus Canal Superfund cleanup; and (3) multiple disclosure lawsuits preceding this transaction[2][10][30]. This pattern suggests systemic governance weaknesses in exercising independent oversight.
Market Implications and Sector Precedents
M&A Process Benchmarking
The suit establishes new expectations for energy transaction transparency. By alleging Hess “did not bother with a market check” despite valuable Guyana assets, plaintiffs imply directors violated Revlon duties to maximize shareholder value[1][45]. This contrasts with Chevron’s disciplined approach in its 2020 Noble Energy acquisition, where data rooms were opened to 12 potential bidders. The case may establish that resource-rich assets require formal sale processes even in corporate mergers, potentially influencing future deals like Occidental Petroleum’s Permian Basin transactions. Energy analysts note the outcome could standardize third-party valuation assessments for major resource holdings during change-of-control events[28][53].
Arbitration’s Ripple Effects
Exxon’s arbitration strategy—filed six months post-deal announcement—reflects sophisticated contractual leveraging. Industry lawyers note joint operating agreements (JOAs) typically include change-of-control provisions, but Exxon’s interpretation that corporate mergers trigger preemptive rights breaks new ground[56][60]. Should the ICC uphold Exxon’s position, operators may revise JOAs to explicitly cover stock acquisitions, fundamentally altering energy M&A structures. Alternatively, a Chevron victory could accelerate corporate-level consolidation. Either outcome pressures dealmakers to conduct exhaustive JOA reviews pre-signing, with Enverus reporting 78% of energy attorneys now recommending “change-of-control audits” for material assets[53][58].
Investor Strategy Shifts
Post-lawsuit investment patterns reveal sector-wide governance repricing. Hess shares underperformed energy peers by 15% year-to-date as the suit amplified existing concerns about midstream self-dealing[2][38]. Short interest climbed to 4.2% of float in June 2025, with firms like MKP Advisors citing “binary arbitration risk”[56]. Value investors now prioritize companies with segregated subsidiary governance, like EOG Resources, avoiding vertically integrated models[28]. Activist funds increasingly demand: (1) independent compensation consultants; (2) clawback provisions for regulatory penalties; and (3) board-level risk committees for major transactions—reflecting lessons from this contested deal[38][53].
Strategic Pathways Forward
Proximate Deal Scenarios
The arbitration ruling’s timing remains uncertain, but Chevron has prepared contingency plans. Should the ICC reject Exxon’s claim, Chevron can close within 10 business days using pre-positioned integration teams and SEC-effective registration statements[61]. If Exxon prevails, three paths emerge: (1) Chevron pays premium compensation for the Guyana stake (estimated $3–5 billion); (2) Exxon acquires Hess’s interest at $53 billion deal-equivalent value; or (3) the transaction terminates with Hess paying Chevron’s $1.7 billion breakup fee[5][18]. Market indicators suggest Scenario 1 is most likely, as Chevron recently acquired 5% of Hess shares ($2.3 billion), signaling commitment to revised terms[61].
Governance Remediation
Regardless of arbitration outcomes, Hess requires governance overhaul. The Detroit suit demands corporate record access to investigate “wrongdoing,” potentially triggering books-and-records inspections under Delaware Code §220[1][45]. Recommended reforms include: (1) separating CEO/Chair roles; (2) appointing a lead independent director; (3) capping change-in-control benefits at 2.99x compensation (down from John Hess’s 4.1x multiple); and (4) implementing multi-year clawbacks for regulatory violations[26][30]. These measures align with Institutional Shareholder Services’ updated guidelines for energy firms, which now penalize boards approving transactions with shareholder approval below 60%[31].
Sector-Wide Lessons
This case establishes critical precedents for energy M&A. First, it demonstrates that target boards must document comprehensive market checks for material assets, even in stock-for-stock deals. Second, JOAs require explicit language regarding corporate change-of-control scenarios. Third, regulatory risk now extends beyond antitrust to executive communications influencing commodity markets. Finally, investors will increasingly litigate transactions approved by narrow margins, especially when combined with controversial executive compensation. As the energy sector faces accelerating consolidation, these lessons will reshape due diligence, contracting, and governance practices across the industry[28][38][53].
Conclusion: Redefining Energy M&A Governance
The Detroit pension fund’s lawsuit transcends the Chevron-Hess transaction, highlighting systemic governance vulnerabilities in energy M&A. With arbitration pending and disclosure deficiencies alleged, this deal exemplifies how overlapping legal, regulatory, and fiduciary challenges can jeopardize strategic combinations. For sector participants, the case underscores non-negotiable requirements: robust market checks for crown-jewel assets, explicit JOA terms covering corporate transactions, and compensation structures aligned with long-term value preservation. As consolidation accelerates post-pandemic, these governance imperatives will separate successful acquirers from those facing investor revolts and regulatory roadblocks. The Hess board’s choices—whether in settlement or litigation—will establish enduring benchmarks for energy dealmaking in an era of heightened accountability.
Sources
https://news.bloombergtax.com/financial-accounting/hess-sued-on-53-billion-chevron-sale-as-panel-preps-deal-ruling, https://www.ainvest.com/news/hess-corp-governance-nightmares-midstream-assets-overvalued-investors-proceed-caution-2505/, https://energynow.com/2024/05/hess-facing-three-lawsuits-over-disclosures-in-chevron-deal/, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/hess-hes-faces-legal-hurdles-over-chevron-deal-disclosures, https://www.offshore-technology.com/news/hess-faces-three-lawsuits/, https://www.law360.com/environmental/articles/2363680/hess-faces-investor-suit-over-53b-chevron-deal, https://www.chevron.com/newsroom/2024/q3/chevron-hess-merger-clears-ftc-antitrust-review, https://seekingalpha.com/article/4799979-chevron-may-not-want-all-of-hess-either, https://www.law360.com/amp/articles/2363680, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hess_Corporation, https://www.law360.com/articles/2286586/ftc-gives-nod-to-chevron-s-53b-hess-buy-with-conditions, https://www.law360.com/articles/2363680, https://finimize.com/content/hess-corp-accused-in-69-million-revenue-diversion-lawsuit, https://www.law360.com/articles/1833348/hess-chevron-merger-hit-with-class-disclosure-suit-in-del, https://www.newsnow.com/us/Business/Companies/Chevron, https://investors.hess.com/static-files/252b5178-b8ec-45ee-a7e2-dbb742ea3cbf, https://www.pymnts.com/cpi-posts/chevrons-53b-mega-merger-with-hess-sets-oil-industry-abuzz/, https://www.offshore-technology.com/news/chevron-hess-arbitration-guyana/, https://www.allsides.com/tags/chevron, https://monexa.ai/blog/hess-corporation-arbitration-impact-financial-stre-HES-2025-07-04, https://businessdesk.co.nz/article/bloomberg/exxon-chief-goes-on-the-offensive-as-wall-street-sours-on-esg, https://energynow.com/2025/07/arbitrators-in-exxon-hess-dispute-over-chevron-deal-have-reached-a-decision-sources-say/, https://www.tipranks.com/news/the-fly/ftc-order-prohibits-chevron-from-appointing-hess-ceo-to-board, https://monexa.ai/blog/hess-corporation-hes-acquisition-arbitration-and-g-HES-2025-06-05, https://www.law360.com/articles/2363680, https://www.alvarezandmarsal.com/sites/default/files/alvarez_marsal_-_change_in_control_report_-_2016.pdf, https://investors.hess.com/static-files/3954174d-9496-4109-9ecb-e196d66e11a1, https://www.ainvest.com/news/betting-turbulence-hess-legal-battles-unleash-profits-energy-2505/, https://www.alvarezandmarsal.com/sites/default/files/95322_tax_executive_change_in_control_report_07.pdf, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/hess-hes-faces-legal-hurdles-over-chevron-deal-disclosures, https://www.capitoltrades.com/articles/hess-corp-s-53b-chevron-merger-faces-critical-vote-2024-05-27, https://news.bloombergtax.com/financial-accounting/abbvie-beats-investor-class-suit-over-alleged-humira-kickbacks, https://www.law360.com/articles/2363680, https://www.plansponsor.com/amended-lawsuit-targets-hess-corp/, https://www.bespc.com/cases/HES, https://www.hartenergy.com/exclusives/continental-suit-alleges-hess-defrauded-it-out-69mm-212957, https://www.legaldive.com/news/ftc-chevron-hess-merger-settlement-HSR-review-holyoak-ferguson-khan-dissent/728702/, https://www.ainvest.com/news/hess-corp-governance-nightmares-midstream-assets-overvalued-investors-proceed-caution-2505/, https://investors.hess.com/static-files/ef5250db-7772-4af7-a025-3b01f0d3b352, https://finimize.com/content/hess-corp-accused-in-69-million-revenue-diversion-lawsuit, https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/hess-hes-faces-legal-hurdles-over-chevron-deal-disclosures, https://www.strategicclaims.net/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/2024-04-11-0135-Joint-Declaration-of-Brian-Calandra-and-Michael-Rogers-with-exhibits-1-13_Part2-revised.pdf, https://www.justice.gov/usao/page/file/1532986/dl?inline, https://www.law360.com/articles/1553365/investor-says-exec-can-t-escape-suit-over-145m-award, https://www.law360.com/articles/2363680, https://www.law360.com/corporate/news?nl_pk=b8127741-1db6-7768-1e11-5d3c37d027ab&page=20, https://www.law360.com/classaction/articles/637038/ill-judge-sends-cashcall-payday-loan-suit-to-arbitration, https://www.clm.com/sitemap/, https://muckrack.com/caroline-simson, https://www.stabroeknews.com/2023/10/24/news/guyana/chevron-to-enter-stabroek-block-in-us53b-buyout-of-hess/, https://monexa.ai/blog/hess-corporation-hes-strategic-update-chevron-acqu-HES-2025-07-03, https://www.law360.com/mergersacquisitions/archive/2025/01, https://www.enverus.com/newsroom/, https://seekingalpha.com/symbol/HES/news, https://www.offshore-technology.com/news/chevron-hess-arbitration-guyana/, https://energynow.com/2024/06/exxon-hess-arbitration-panel-incomplete-hess-sale-to-chevron-stalled/, https://villagevoicenews.com/2025/07/06/ruling-reached-in-exxon-hess-dispute-over-guyana-oil-deal/, https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2694399-exxonmobil-upbeat-over-guyana-arbitration, https://oilnow.gy/featured/decision-reached-in-arbitration-over-hess-stake-in-guyanas-stabroek-block/, https://viamediationcentre.org/readnews/MTYxMA==/The-battle-for-Guyanas-oil-ExxonMobil-vs-Chevron-and-Hess, https://tankterminals.com/news/chevron-prepares-to-close-hess-acquisition/, https://www.worldoil.com/news/2025/5/29/exxon-plans-to-operate-in-guyana-as-usual-if-it-loses-chevron-hess-arbitration/